4 ms·
Is there actually a material cost for them to host inactive accounts? Even if the end goal is profitability, seems they are very eager to throw their goodwill/
by adam_arthur 4y ago
Is there actually a material cost for them to host inactive accounts?
Even if the end goal is profitability, seems they are very eager to throw their goodwill/brand into the wood chipper, which is going to be counterproductive in the end.
There are already tons of PayPal equivalent services that anybody can use. Not even sure what the differentiator is for them, or why they are relevant anymore.
- withinboredom 4y agoPossibly. I know in the US, banks have to report dormant accounts under a certain value, which doesn't "cost" anything but a salary/bandwidth to handle the reporting/questions/etc.