4 ms·
Just how wide do you want "widely" to be? Are you trying to say we don't learn anything about this subject from clinical trials? I'm sure data related to the ma
by dpedu 4y ago
Just how wide do you want "widely" to be? Are you trying to say we don't learn anything about this subject from clinical trials? I'm sure data related to the many clinical trials I mentioned is available.
- sokoloff 4y agoWide enough to hit the vast majority of ages, races, health statuses [pregnancy, cancer, other medications/medical conditions] to which the vaccine will be deployed and in numbers sufficient that 1 in 10K [or even 1 in 1K] frequency adverse reactions would be reasonably sure to have shown up. (1 in 10K across an 8B population is 800K adverse reactions; 1 in 1K is 8 million people...). Are you trying to say that we learn everything about this subject from clinical trials?