4 ms·
That really depends on the age group. The chances of someone under 30 having any real negative effects to Covid is virtually 0, while there is some evidence poi
by cragfar 4y ago
That really depends on the age group. The chances of someone under 30 having any real negative effects to Covid is virtually 0, while there is some evidence pointing to males under the age of 30 having issues with the vaccine.
- bluGill 4y agoThe chance of a male under 30 having issues is also virtually zero.
- yucky 4y agoSounds like there never was a reasonable case for mandates then :)
- hedora 4y agoFor young people the risk of death goes from something like 0.1% to 0.01% with the vaccine (just aiming for order of magnitude risks), which isn't a big deal for an individual. However, when you are talking about populations of 10s of millions in low risk age ranges, it's 10,000's of preventable deaths! Even if you don't care about the deaths (it's their choice to die; whatever), note that for every death, there are 10-100 long covid cases that are pulling resources from the health care system indefinitely. The vaccine seems to cut those by about 90% too. Why should we waste tax dollars on medicare and welfare for anti-vaxxers?
- yucky 4y agoWhy should we waste tax dollars on medicare and welfare for anti-vaxxers? Then we should use this same argument against obesity, drug use and other dangerous activities as well, right?
- peteradio 4y ago> it's 10,000's of preventable deaths! Not in young age groups its not. Those 10k at risk of Covid death are at significantly higher risk of death from other causes too. If we stratified by more than age you'd see significantly reduced IFR among all age groups in the group without comorbidities. Quit lumping all people together, this is the age of big data and we should be using it to enhance lives not subjugate with blithe renderings.