4 ms·
I'm not implying anything. See my earlier comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33595347 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33595347
by sfusato 4y ago
I'm not implying anything. See my earlier comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33595347 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33595347
- SideburnsOfDoom 4y agoI also see the _late addition_ of "to those under 50/65 years of age" in grandparent comment, which changes the meaning quite a bit. These countries, for many people, are recommending further boosters. In the UK's case, the NHS "invites people 50 and over for autumn boosters" (1) which doesn't rule out any further action later for under 50s. https://www.england.nhs.uk/2022/10/nhs-invites-people-50-and-over-for-autumn-boosters-and-flu-jab/ https://www.england.nhs.uk/2022/10/nhs-invites-people-50-and...
- sfusato 4y agoI've later added that "50/65 age" mention. Apologies for that. So, you reckon this a not important change in policy? I personally find it as a radical change in policy, almost short of an apology to be honest.