tbh in the long term probably a good thing for the Democrats. Yes less money seems bad, but the money was probably going to pump the tires of weak candidates t

tbh in the long term probably a good thing for the Democrats. Yes less money seems bad, but the money was probably going to pump the tires of weak candidates that couldn't get by on their own. I recall reading that one of the candidates that SBF was funding lost in the primaries to a more leftie democrat, and that candidate went on to win. So what's the point of the money here if the party is able to select good winning candidates without.