3 ms·
Instead of http://example.org/hw.txt?hl=zQmWvQxTqbG2Z9HPJgG57jjwR154cKhbtJenbyYTWkjgF3e why not just let the url be the hash? http://example.org/zQmW
by pyrolistical 4y ago
Instead of
http://example.org/hw.txt?hl=zQmWvQxTqbG2Z9HPJgG57jjwR154cKhbtJenbyYTWkjgF3e
why not just let the url be the hash?
http://example.org/zQmWvQxTqbG2Z9HPJgG57jjwR154cKhbtJenbyYTWkjgF3e
Servers should return Content-Disposition (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Content-Disposition https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Co...) for the filename
- rkeene2 4y agoAssuming that hash is base64 encoded, this solution would conflict with RFC 2616 (and this approach caused Let's Encrypt to fail sometimes too [0] !) [0] https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/may-19-2017-ocsp-and-issuance-outage-postmortem/34922 https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/may-19-2017-ocsp-and-iss...