3 ms·
My take at the moment is that each humans are like cells of a human where the human is a civilisation. We have autonomy but must generally work for the welfare
by alfor 4y ago
My take at the moment is that each humans are like cells of a human where the human is a civilisation.
We have autonomy but must generally work for the welfare of the whole organism. If some people are not aligned to the general good we try to dissuade them or punish them because if it become too big the whole system collapse in the same way that our organism would if there is too many cancer cells.
Our consciousness operate on the scale of a human life but there is a similar "consciousness" of the civilisation that operate on a much larger timescale, thousand of years, we call those religions.
While we can seek personal gain, it’s much the same as a cell trying to outcompete it’s neighborhoods, it’s misaligned to the more important goal of global welfare. There is something inside us in our soul that know this and won’t make you satisfied of yourself if you are not a net positive for the whole.
Now we have looked everywhere to try to find the God of our stories but didn’t (it's a pattern operating on a different timescale). So we are like cells that rebelled against the organism, discarting all the rules that we had because we don’t understand them. The result will be a sickness of the organism up to a point where we see we have to go back to our ancients rules or the death of the organism (civilisation collapse)
Those rules are:
each must try to align himself with truth and love toward others, must try it’s best, it’s ok to fail, but recognised it and improve.
Those rules are the preconditions for the survival and slow improvement of our civilisation.
Other religions have other rules and other outcomes.