4 ms·
My personal observation is that these generators fail miserably when generating low-detail parts and hair. In many of these pictures you don't have to look at t
by friendzis 4y ago
My personal observation is that these generators fail miserably when generating low-detail parts and hair. In many of these pictures you don't have to look at the face at all, but rather look at the background and the one with heavy artifacting will be fake. In "enterprise" style pictures one can look at hairs and find heavy artifacting there.
- ch4s3 4y agofor me the eyes looked really off in all the fakes, the pupils seems like the wrong size for the level of light and looked like the shape of the eye didn't fit into the bone structure of the face.
- dinosaurdynasty 4y agoProblem is most people don't look heavily at people's hair and backgrounds when seeing a random photo somewhere, they look at the face! I imagine this kind of stuff will trick a lot of people in practice.
- friendzis 4y agoSure, I completely agree on this one - AI generated faces have been pretty decent for years now. The quality is currently in some weird space: with careful preselection they can fool unsuspecting reader passing by and yet at the same time reader looking for fakes will detect them (given high enough size/quality) with high confidence.