There’s a CLA that places specific restrictions on how the contribution can be re-licensed: http://www.harmonyagreements.org/docs/ha-cla-i.html http://www.harmo

There’s a CLA that places specific restrictions on how the contribution can be re-licensed: http://www.harmonyagreements.org/docs/ha-cla-i.html http://www.harmonyagreements.org/docs/ha-cla-i.html I think it’s fair to demand that clarity. Keep in mind though that if a project is already using a permissive license it’s always going to be easy to make the project open core or for someone to make a proprietary work with your contribution. Contrary to this article’s statements CLAs are actually easier for everyone involved at least on the second contribution due to the tools that exist. It’s just a checkbox on a PR.