I think it has more to do with survivorship bias. To be considered as systems, the elements we considered must be linked and display some stability otherwise i

I think it has more to do with survivorship bias. To be considered as systems, the elements we considered must be linked and display some stability otherwise it would just be chaos and we wouldn’t find it remarkable. Linked elements means you will see feedback loops. Stability implies some notion of fixed points which means convergence and therefore probably oscillation. It’s not so much that a fundamental grammar emerges from dynamic systems than we consider things as forming a dynamic system when they fit the grammar we have defined.