4 ms·

Don't forget that it's also more radioactive than nuclear waste: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/ htt

• pvaldes 4y ago
  And banana plantations (or granite mountains, or the sun) are more radioactive than both because you have a lot of bananas with weak radioactivity each one, but the sum of all bananas in fruit shops is not how we measure radioactivity danger. Coal is accumulated and relatively low, nuclear is concentrated and can reach several orders of magnitude more. Really, is not so useful to compare both cases except for whataboutism.
  • askvictor 4y ago
    It is very much useful to compare them in the contexts of energy sources and the dangers that these pose to populations.
  • Gordonjcp 4y ago
    > Coal is accumulated and relatively low, nuclear is concentrated and can reach several orders of magnitude more. Really, is not so useful to compare both cases except for whataboutism. That's nice but you still have to wear a dosimeter around fly ash.