It kind of exposes "wealth inequality" as a bullshit idea. What would be better for society, unskilled laborers earning a livable wage and a handful of $100 bil

It kind of exposes "wealth inequality" as a bullshit idea. What would be better for society, unskilled laborers earning a livable wage and a handful of $100 billionaires, or, post-recession, those same wage-earners earning 20% less but the billionaires net worth all cut in half. A simple example for sure but the goal should be to raise the living standards at the bottom, not to limit (or even care about) what the top top top net-worths (or incomes) are.