3 ms·
gcc was relevant on DOS and Windows thanks to djgpp; it was basically the only free option for a time.
by dleslie 4y ago
gcc was relevant on DOS and Windows thanks to djgpp; it was basically the only free option for a time.
- pjmlp 4y agoNo one cared about it, Borland and Microsoft dominated, those that could not buy them, would get copies from a street bazar.
- skissane 4y agoIt was popular with people who came from a Unix background and wanted to port Unix software to DOS/Windows (or even OS/2). While the API differences were still a challenge, GCC did better at code ported from Unix than Borland/Microsoft/etc did - especially since a lot of that software was already being compiled under GCC on Unix anyway True that Borland/Microsoft was more popular among professional DOS/Windows developers, especially those for whom that was their native platform > those that could not buy them, would get copies from a street bazar Teenage me didn’t know of any “street bazaars” selling Microsoft/Borland developer tool warez. But I walked into the local computer shop and saw some modestly priced CD-ROMs, with GCC (among other things), and convinced my Dad to buy them for me.