23 ms·
I used Berkeley's Franz LISP ...That was a compiler which generated .o files. ... But you didn't link the .o files; you had to load them into the development e
by jonjacky 4y ago
I used Berkeley's Franz LISP ...That was a compiler which generated .o files.
... But you didn't link the .o files; you had to load them into the development environment to run them. Compiling was just an optimization.
That sounds the same as Python and Java work now. For python, you have .py source code files or .pyc or .pyo compiled files, but you still have to load
them into the Python interpreter.
I asked the Franz LISP devs why they didn't provide a runtime you could just link in, yielding a releaseable executable program without all the baggage for breaking and debugging.
Even now, you typically need to have Python or Java installed on your computer to run Python or Java programs. There are ways to generate standalone Python executables but it's not the usual way of working.
- rjsw 4y ago> That sounds the same as Python and Java work now. Not really, the .o files were fully compiled, they just needed to call C functions in the Franz Lisp runtime.