3 ms·
How is this problem an opposite argument against women allowed to have an abortion? Surely these are two parallel issues that can be solved separately from each
by heavenlyblue 4y ago
How is this problem an opposite argument against women allowed to have an abortion? Surely these are two parallel issues that can be solved separately from each other.
By your logic women should not be able to abort because there's still kids in third world countries suffering from hunger.
- ajsnigrutin 4y ago> By your logic women should not be able to abort because there's still kids in third world countries suffering from hunger. No, by my logic, if women have that option, men should be given a "way out" from unwanted kids too, even if it's due to financial or other non-medical reasons. Obviously men cannot physically abort, so a paper abortion (giving up all rights and responsibilities) would be a way out for them/us.
- heavenlyblue 4y agoI don't understand how this is directly related to the women's abortion issue though. This is whataboutism at it's best.
- ajsnigrutin 4y agoIt's not. If we're talking about abortions as medical solutions (risky pregnancies, medical issues with the baby, etc...) then sure. If we give half the population an option to get rid of a result of a five-minute mistake, for personal, financial and even for reasons such as "I just don't want one now", why not give that way-out to the other half involved in that five-minute fuckup? Otherwise we're literally talking about 20+ years of relatively huge consequences.