Is there any reason that needs to be more legally valid than "Google suspended it?" It's their store and their rules; there's no contract law overriding that b

Is there any reason that needs to be more legally valid than "Google suspended it?" It's their store and their rules; there's no contract law overriding that basic premise that I'm aware of. "We let ourselves be lied to and are disinclined to correct our error" is exactly as valid a legal reason as others because Google is the sole arbiter of the enforcement of their own store TOS. Perhaps this should be changed, but there isn't really much legal groundwork on what that change would look like.