4 ms·
I agree overall, but I don't think it'll be VS Code in the browser, I think VS Code's remote features with the client-server model (client: VS Code's UI running
by robenkleene 4y ago
I agree overall, but I don't think it'll be VS Code in the browser, I think VS Code's remote features with the client-server model (client: VS Code's UI running locally, and server: the code executing and file-system running on the server).
I've also tried VS Code in the browser, and personally I find it an absolute unusable mess, the key binding space is just way to overloaded for a complex app like VS Code, and the browser itself to co-exist (e.g., many of VS Code's important bindings get eaten by the browser itself). I think that all that really matters is that the UI for complex apps runs locally.
(But I could be wrong here, I don't make the mistake of extrapolating my own experiences to other users. E.g., I also find VS Code to be so slow I avoid, but most users couldn't care less. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27360494 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27360494)
- danpalmer 4y agoGood point, remote dev is probably the more appropriate tech for most orgs. FWIW, I'm incredibly picky about shortcuts, and as long as you use Chrome to "install" the web app, it basically works fine.