4 ms·

Thanks for your response, and yes, you are very right. However, A/B testing has many vital issues, such as it can take really long time and take lots of resourc

Thanks for your response, and yes, you are very right. However, A/B testing has many vital issues, such as it can take really long time and take lots of resources, that is not something that everyone can afford. In addition, A/B testing is needed for every variable under test, But in the case of an AI tool simulating digital users on a scale, it can minimize the time and resources, in addition, it can actually test for multiple variables at the same time. . I would love to know more if you have other questions, or concerns? what would encourage you to actually test or use it?

thatwasunusual 4y ago
> However, A/B testing has many vital issues, such as it can take really long time and take lots of resources I no longer understand your product, when you explain it like this. Are you saying that with your product, product developers no longer have to develop features to test out?
- Belalmostafa 4y ago
  No, I mean you no longer need to test the feature on actual users to know how they might react to it.
  - thatwasunusual 4y ago
    IMO, the product is useless then. The cost of developing the feature is developing the actual feature, not testing it. A/B-testing is a no-cost these days; you create two branches, and then deploy it with a 5/95 (or whatever) balancing.