I think you have the cart before the horse. The culture has changed because hormones, environment, food, medicine, etc have impacted the humans. It seems righ

I think you have the cart before the horse. The culture has changed because hormones, environment, food, medicine, etc have impacted the humans. It seems right to you, because you are a product of all those environmental changes. Or, put more harshly, because males are more feminised, strong males are seen as intimidating, and this is perceived as a problem. Without making a judgement about right or wrong, what I wonder about is 'what is more natural'? My view is that the older way was more natural - plainly big aggra, big pharma, big governance, etc played less of a role in determining the environment (and therefore less of a role in determining human attributes) in the past. I also can't help wondering whether this is by design - plainly a more feminised culture would be less problematic to those who control/run society. I'm sure 'they' took inspiration from books like brave new world, which very plainly lays out the idea of using everything at one's disposal to engineer a populace that is most amenable to following the governance structure.