> From an EA perspective, SBF made a morally correct gamble since his intent was to donate all the winnings. No, that's a caricature of EA (edit: AFAICT EA see

> From an EA perspective, SBF made a morally correct gamble since his intent was to donate all the winnings. No, that's a caricature of EA (edit: AFAICT EA seems to be about working within the system). There are perfectly rational reasons not to break moral standards (such as not gambling with other people's money or lying about safekeeping it): the world becomes a worse and unstable place and becomes far harder to improve when everyone acts like that, when you can't trust other actors; and people will keep score of how you behave. (In another comment I wrote what may seem to be a contradictory view, but I was considering a completely abstract gamble there, not what SBF actually did.)