> From an EA perspective, SBF made a morally correct gamble since his intent was to donate all the winnings. EA perspective is not limited to one specific mora

> From an EA perspective, SBF made a morally correct gamble since his intent was to donate all the winnings. EA perspective is not limited to one specific moral foundation (in this case act utilitarianism), it is a general idea that if you are going to be altruistic (for whatever reason), you should rationally focus on how to get best 'benefit to others' for your money. EA is not moral philosophy, it is altruistic strategy. For some, altruism is not even connected to morality. So the gamble you describe is more argument against act utilitarianism than against EA.