3 ms·
Uses the same folder-list paradigm as ClickUp, which, as a long time JIRA user recently converted to ClickUp, I find to be a plus. The simplicity and responsive
by hliyan 4y ago
Uses the same folder-list paradigm as ClickUp, which, as a long time JIRA user recently converted to ClickUp, I find to be a plus. The simplicity and responsiveness of the interface appears to be an improvement over ClickUp. However, one thing I love about ClickUp is its ability to quickly configure task statuses (which in JIRA, is the equivalent of programming a VCR). So if this product could add flexible task statuses, and also task tags, it might be a low cost contender to ClickUp.
Edit: also, rather than folders > lists > sections, it might be worthwhile to introduce nested folders, which is a very popular feature request in ClickUp but that team never actually got around to adding it. Another thing: subtasks.
- hliyan 4y agoJust figured out that sections map to statuses. Not a bad idea.
- tonypham 4y agoYes, you can use sections for task statuses.
- hliyan 4y agoChat/message feature is great -- can avoid project-related slack messages.
- tonypham 4y agoThanks so much for your feedback. We do plan to add custom fields in the upcoming months, and you can create custom task statuses from there. Tags in on our roadmap as well. We'll consider nested folders if there are enough demands. You can create subtasks now, but not nested subtasks yet.