3 ms·
(Brings forth their best George Carlin impersonation) Plastic! ...I mean, my understanding was that the elephant in the room is BPA and microplastics, but mayb
by rzzzt 4y ago
(Brings forth their best George Carlin impersonation) Plastic!
...I mean, my understanding was that the elephant in the room is BPA and microplastics, but maybe all the other factors are not given enough attention.
- 2-718-281-828 4y agoin most of asia you have to consume all your water from plastic bottles or canisters. do asians have lower testosterone on average?
- rjzzleep 4y agoI've long been wondering about plastic as well. Plastic wrapped food, plastic packaged food, drinks etc. A lot of these things are actually filled and sealed while warm and then heated in plastic, which means it leaks into the food. A sibling comment commented on all the hormones in dairy and other foods. I remember that there were even issues with the contraceptive pill in wastewater effects on aquatic life. One thing I'd like to know is if the effect on east Asian societies is worse given how much more plastic they use than say European ones. Somewhat unrelated but interesting is the focus on BPA. It is actually not proven that the other plastics are good, it just means we have data on BPA.
- TaupeRanger 4y agoThat's not really established by strong evidence. Most of it is cross sectional data without any clinically relevant endpoints. In other words, we have no idea if or how it affects any part of male fertility or testosterone production that humans actually care about. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304337/ Anecdotally, if someone like John Carmack can drink 9 Diet Cokes per day without noticeable ill-effects over several decades, it's going to take strong evidence that he (and others like him) are major outliers in their resistance to BPA "damage" to convince people that a small amount of BPA in their foods and drinks is harmful enough to change their lifestyle and habits to avoid it.
- forgotmypw17 4y agoAnytime I read "no established evidence", I think about cigarettes in the 1950s and 1960s.
- TaupeRanger 4y agoWhy admit to a logical fallacy on a public forum?
- forgotmypw17 4y agoMy logic is that it is advantageous and desirable to use doubt-inducing statements such as "not established strong evidence" to defend profitable but harmful products. Where is the logical fallacy?
- formerly_proven 4y agoTobacco use being hugely detrimental to health has been known and scientifically published since the 18th century.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- shawnz 4y agoIt's advantageous to use such language to defend harmless products too?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- forgotmypw17 4y agoWhat is proven harmless that's been covered in this thread?
- friedman23 4y agoI don't want to throw out this idea but I think the much more obvious answer is people being sedentary and terrible sleep. Boys that are playing video games instead of running around outdoors. Playing video games until 3 am one night, waking up for school with 5 hours of sleep, then drinking massive amounts of energy drinks or other stimulants to stay awake.