4 ms·
AI that predicts how users respond to a feature before launching it
Hi everyone.
It always happens to all of us when building a specific software that we think that a specific feature will kill it, and our users will love it. But after launching it, it turns out the exact opposite.
It happens to the best of us, even when u do customer interviews, and the only way to avoid that is through extensive large-scale customer interviews, and customer analysis with large and experienced teams, which is something that most startups can't afford.
For this reason, I am building an AI SaaS that will let you simulate how your product users will interact and respond to a specific feature before you actually launch it.
I would like to hear your thoughts about the SaaS I am building and what you would love to see in such a tool, or if you even don't think that I should build it.
If you would like to test the tool once its ready for early adopters, please fill this form so that I can reach out to you https://forms.gle/vkZw2tvGhyoeySGQA
Just hit me with your opinions.
- thatwasunusual 4y agoIsn't this basically the same as A/B-testing, which I assume is better and safer because real people are involved in testing new features/changes?
- Belalmostafa 4y agoThanks for your response, and yes, you are very right. However, A/B testing has many vital issues, such as it can take really long time and take lots of resources, that is not something that everyone can afford. In addition, A/B testing is needed for every variable under test, But in the case of an AI tool simulating digital users on a scale, it can minimize the time and resources, in addition, it can actually test for multiple variables at the same time. . I would love to know more if you have other questions, or concerns? what would encourage you to actually test or use it?
- thatwasunusual 4y ago> However, A/B testing has many vital issues, such as it can take really long time and take lots of resources I no longer understand your product, when you explain it like this. Are you saying that with your product, product developers no longer have to develop features to test out?
- Belalmostafa 4y agoNo, I mean you no longer need to test the feature on actual users to know how they might react to it.
- thatwasunusual 4y agoIMO, the product is useless then. The cost of developing the feature is developing the actual feature, not testing it. A/B-testing is a no-cost these days; you create two branches, and then deploy it with a 5/95 (or whatever) balancing.
- Belalmostafa 4y agoIn addition, A/B testing means you actually invested in launching the feature and testing it on some real users as you mentioned, however, in our case, you get to get feedback before actually doing that without risking - at least this is our promise - the validity of the conclusions.