3 ms·
Hate to inform you that the "cat is literally out of the bag" now. There's no putting it back. If it isn't DA it would be someone else. Right now, anyone who do
by random_cynic 4y ago
Hate to inform you that the "cat is literally out of the bag" now. There's no putting it back. If it isn't DA it would be someone else. Right now, anyone who does anything creative like painters, authors, composers, designers have to live with the fact that AI can generate something similar to what they can and (this is the most tragic part) generate material that would be indistinguishable (or perhaps even superior) to the general public who're not connoisseurs of their art.
- iszomer 4y agoI wonder what would Beeple say.. "Welp, I made my worth, so long suckers!"?
- PinkMilkshake 4y agoI have to agree, this is a pointless battle. It doesn't matter what DA does or doesn't do. If your art is on the internet, it will be used to train AI. It's not even that it's an inevitable future, it's already the past. I do feel sorry for digital artists, but Pandora's box is open; A black ball has been drawn from the urn (in the world of digital art) and it's too late to do anything meaningful about it.
- visarga 4y agoA black ball for artists who don't use AI, for sure. The artists who jump on this trend will be benefiting the most as they know how to guide the AI better and can fix errors manually.