That's basically a strawman. Privacy conscious people are against mass surveillance, where everybody privacy is invaded by default, even if they've done nothin

That's basically a strawman. Privacy conscious people are against mass surveillance, where everybody privacy is invaded by default, even if they've done nothing wrong and aren't suspicious. Privacy as we had before technology that allowed such things is what such group desire. Is there someone suspected of a crime? Sure, tailgate them, follow them, etc. This manual surveillance has a cost and max throughput that makes it you cant mass surveil.