> (...) but I believe that Syntax 2 is an excuse create a new language and reuse the C++ name. This. It looks like a blatant attempt to ride the coattails of C

> (...) but I believe that Syntax 2 is an excuse create a new language and reuse the C++ name. This. It looks like a blatant attempt to ride the coattails of C++, which oddly enough is not the first case coming from Redmond (see C++/CX). If the concept is able to fly on its own without these marketing crutches then it would be more credible to just claim it's a successor.