3 ms·
I tried using that a few years ago but kept running into miscompiled code. Has it improved since then?
by royjacobs 4y ago
I tried using that a few years ago but kept running into miscompiled code. Has it improved since then?
- djmips 4y agoYes, it has improved. However I always use it to write new code and my code is simple - it didn't start out trying to be standards compliant so you may still run into trouble if you are using the full vocabulary of C and in this case you may find cc65 or the LLVM-MOS 6502 backend more suitable. KickC's advantage is that it does produce reasonably fast code and it integrates into the Kick assembler workflow.