That’s really interesting. Seems, though, like there are two elements missing that would really tie this down (and maybe details of these elements have subseque

That’s really interesting. Seems, though, like there are two elements missing that would really tie this down (and maybe details of these elements have subsequently emerged in recent days or will emerge): 1. Shouldn’t the FTX.us president’s resignation have occurred back in Q2 when FTX customer money was allegedly being used to prop up Alameda? I don’t understand why whatever happened in Q2 was OK with him (unless he didn’t know about it, or course), but repaying FTX was a bridge too far for him. 2. As I read the thread you linked, it doesn’t seem like there was any on-chain indication of Alameda/FTX transactions in Q2? Still, really interesting theory and tantalizing evidence. Edit: Ah, just saw another post below that SBF had a backdoor to obfuscate transfers between Alameda and FTX. That could explain #2.