4 ms·
Nope. There’s nothing new in the way COVID deaths are reported, and in fact making the distinction you’re demanding is what would be the break from standard pra
by _djo_ 4y ago
Nope. There’s nothing new in the way COVID deaths are reported, and in fact making the distinction you’re demanding is what would be the break from standard practice. Death certificates have for decades had contributory causes listed with the main one being the most proximate cause.
For instance if someone has severe hypertension and then has a heart attack both are usually listed but the heart attack is the cause of death.
I don’t see any need to debunk it further because the claim is patent nonsense and I’m surprised to see anyone still repeating it after all this time.
- peteradio 4y agoIt should then be easy for you to cite a source for "Over one million Americans are dead of Covid"
- _djo_ 4y agoSure. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/from-our-experts/u-s-officially-surpasses-1-million-covid-19-deaths https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/from-our-experts/u-s-officially-...
- peteradio 4y agoNot sure how to respond, those are deaths w/ covid, which depends entirely on the jurisdiction from where they are counted. PCR test within 60 days of death, good enough to call it a covid death.
- _djo_ 4y agoYou can't seriously still be going down this line of argument. There are at least a million Americans, and many more globally, who are dead when they otherwise would not have been. Denying this is insanity.
- peteradio 4y agoThe average age of covid death is ~80, you're saying all those folks would still be alive if not for covid?
- ohiovr 4y agoThe leading cause of death in Canada is unknown.