I understand, but it isn’t the conclusion. I read it obviously, the sentence I quoted is in the conclusion as well. The title is spurring the same old boring “c

I understand, but it isn’t the conclusion. I read it obviously, the sentence I quoted is in the conclusion as well. The title is spurring the same old boring “crypo bad/ crypto good” arguments we’ve been over 1000 times. We should be talking about the techniques described in the paper, and the fact that they determined it is possible to detect early on with some confidence if a project is solid, or a scam. This should be a positive for the “crypto bad” folks if you ask me. But this is getting lost.