3 ms·
> only “3%” of what he has Ok, sure, when he's ready to present that let's discuss it. Until then it's nothing. But what's the point of doing an interview and
by anm89 4y ago
> only “3%” of what he has
Ok, sure, when he's ready to present that let's discuss it. Until then it's nothing. But what's the point of doing an interview and saying "I've got good info but I'm not going to share it until later"
- bmitc 4y agoI think most of his points stand. The questions should be answerable. However, you’re right that we’re taking it at face value that he has more that he supposedly wants to publish later. It isn’t clear he has more, but certainly there are huge amount of questions surrounding FTX and Alameda that are not answerable, even prior to this whole debacle. I think one searches for darker answers because the likely answer, that everyone was duped by these people in normal ways and there’s not some deeper connection, is a far more disturbing prospect.