4 ms·
No. It's not. Why would you think it would be?
by chatterhead 4y ago
No. It's not. Why would you think it would be?
- encryptluks2 4y agoBecause those people do not have access to something that someone is stating as censorship resistant, when in fact not having access to the funds to pay for something is in fact suppressing people with alternative views that cannot otherwise participate.
- chatterhead 4y agoHow about read-only free; comment-cost? Would that be fair? That way truth can permeate their world, but shaping it requires payment?
- encryptluks2 4y agoNo... If people can't participate then it is a form of censorship.
- smoldesu 4y agoIf you think that people are going to pay money to tell you the truth, then you must have been asleep for the past week of "Verified" madness on Twitter.