3 ms·
Yea I am not a fan of the Cloud and many of its complexities but if I have to be honest, when you have 5k employees working on AWS resources: yes, this complexi
by systemvoltage 4y ago
Yea I am not a fan of the Cloud and many of its complexities but if I have to be honest, when you have 5k employees working on AWS resources: yes, this complexity is actually requested by customers. It was built to meet their granular needs. Same thing with policies.
To the author of the article: AWS is too complex? Then it is not for you.
That said, various cloud providers have different levels of complexity and it is definitely up for debate and criticism.
- SkyPuncher 4y agoThe problem is all of these providers should have simple roll ups.
- insanitybit 4y agoRoll ups have their own problems. In particular, you really don't want them changing over time. I have banned all of the "managed policies" at my company because AWS is free to add new permissions and you have no way of knowing.
- SkyPuncher 4y agoWell that can be solved with versioning. Rollups can simply be a suggested collection of permissions. When they change, view a diff, and accept what you need.
- makeitdouble 4y ago> AWS is too complex? Then it is not for you. But then neither are GCP and Azure. I only know three other decently reliable cloud providers from there, but you also won’t get as much community support nor legal adjustment like GCP does for EU hosting. You might be right, but that only further explains why it’s such a pain at this point.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- systemvoltage 4y agoOne of the core value propositions of Linode/DigitalOcean is exactly this – reduce complexity but that also comes with reduced flexibilty and features. The fact that Linode/DigitalOcean exists and relies on this core tenant is a testament to quite the reverse: AWS/GCP/Azure are complex to meet the needs of their customers or they wouldn't allow Linode/DigitalOcean to exist and consequently absorb their customers. They both co-exist on the axis of complexity. In some ways, it is a loose proof/evidence that AWS/GCP/Azure is complex to serve their customers, not because of incompetence or some other reason.
- lukewiwa 4y agoAWS has its lightsail range of products which offers exactly this. A much more simplified and opinionated set of products and much fewer knobs to turn.
- saurik 4y agoThis resonates in an interesting way; like, I remember thinking S3 and then EC2 were pretty inspired simple concepts, and then they just kept getting more and more complicated over the years. I feel like if I were to start using them today as the sole engineer I am I'd be really daunted by the extreme complexity they've seemingly added. In particular, VPC to me looks like an over-engineered mess designed to replicate the historical baggage of network hardware and addressing when all they really needed to do was add nested security groups (as well as allow multiple security groups, which they did finally do at some point) and call it a day, but if you are some ridiculously large company that has a million legacy network engineers and want to build some super complicated stack of domains I guess you like doing it with virtual hardware? But it sucks because cloud (very much "to me") was the thing that allowed small teams--or even one sole bad-ass engineer--to rapidly build scalable infrastructure, NOT something that would be used by giant companies to build empires :(.