3 ms·
I work on sharding at a bigcorp. Why not simply limit sign ups to a single Mastodon server which is then considered a shard in The overall fediverse. Stops one/
by killingtime74 4y ago
I work on sharding at a bigcorp. Why not simply limit sign ups to a single Mastodon server which is then considered a shard in The overall fediverse. Stops one/some servers from becoming to powerful too
- mdaniel 4y agoWell, according to that theory all servers are fungible, but having read over quite a few of the Mastodon /about pages over the past few days, they are for sure not. The audience and sometimes the rules vary wildly Also, while yes federated etc etc, I for sure get a lot more enjoyment from the "Local Timeline" in my server than trying to keep up with the absolute firehose of "Federated Timeline" which is another reason to pick one where the local content would be interesting
- OctopusLupid 4y agoThat is indeed usually what happens if the admin doesn't want to deal with a big userbase. I run an instance and I intend to close it off if it reaches about 100 monthly active users.