4 ms·
I don't think people realize how big of a collapse UST was. $18 billion market cap that vanished in a week. The fact that Do Kwon is not in jail yet is astonish
by ryanSrich 4y ago
I don't think people realize how big of a collapse UST was. $18 billion market cap that vanished in a week. The fact that Do Kwon is not in jail yet is astonishing to me. FTX by comparison is on the hook for $10 billion, about half of the UST collapse. Everything we're seeing is a result of Do Kwon's scamming.
- World177 4y agoY Combinator also backed a failed company [1] that was trying to take advantage of the high APR (20%) for UST staking. [2] I don't think there has been confirmation yet about how much UST Alameda was holding, but if true, it would add more context to CZ's tweet "liquidating our FTT is just post-exit risk management, learning from LUNA. We gave support before, but we won't pretend to make love after divorce." [3] [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31686140 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31686140 [2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-23/terra-s-promise-of-20-defi-return-raises-sustainability-concern https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-23/terra-s-p... [3] https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1589374530413215744 https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1589374530413215744
- lend000 4y agoUST wasn't a true stablecoin (it isn't like any dollars disappeared from the ecosystem), so I'd put it in the same category as the hundreds of billions in "vanished" market value that was a simple consequence of the declining value of crypto in general. Whether or not Alameda was holding a bunch of UST or Luna, is another question. SBF seemed to be pretty all in on fringe shitcoins, so I would not be surprised if they had significant exposure.