>>This isn't true now and has never been true. Otherwise frontline workers would make a lot more and CEOs would make a lot less. Neither one of those statement

>>This isn't true now and has never been true. Otherwise frontline workers would make a lot more and CEOs would make a lot less. Neither one of those statements follow each other. You may belive, and in some cases you may be correct that a CEO is of less value than frontline workers, but the prevailing narrative I see across the internet that workers bring "all the value" is also false >Wages already have skewed dynamics based on a bunch of arbitrary reasons. They are not really that arbitrary, pricing for wages are set largely by 3 factors 1. Market Demand for a given role 2. Number of people available to fill a given role 3. Amount of revenue a company can generate from a given role Wage pricing is a balance of all 3 factors,