3 ms·
No, that's why they said it is the "right of the militia to keep and bear arms." If they wanted it to apply to people, unconnected to the militia they would ha
by notch656a 4y ago
No, that's why they said it is the "right of the militia to keep and bear arms."
If they wanted it to apply to people, unconnected to the militia they would have said "the right of the People to keep and bear arms."
Wait...
- agensaequivocum 4y agoRead the founders, DC v Heller and this Twitter thread https://twitter.com/MorosKostas/status/1523800762706325504 https://twitter.com/MorosKostas/status/1523800762706325504.
- agensaequivocum 4y agoAnother point you completely mis-quoted the amendment. It states > A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
- Cyberdog 4y agoYes, that was the joke. Note that notch656a has posted pro-2A comments elsewhere in this hellthread.
- agensaequivocum 4y agoAh missed that. Thanks.