7 ms·
Not the person you're responding to. But I concur. How will one separate money from state and then protect one's state-separated money without themselves becomi
by deebosong 4y ago
Not the person you're responding to. But I concur. How will one separate money from state and then protect one's state-separated money without themselves becoming a "state" of sorts, that then is fused to their money? And then everyone becomes their own little island/state, that is fused to their money, and then you forge alliances and become allied island-states, and so on and so forth, until you become a nation of sorts?
Like cmon now. Isn't that the inevitable progression? And if so, doesn't that mean these folks who insist upon separating state from money just want to become the ruling class?
I dunno. That's just how it always comes across to me.
- cellis 4y agoCentralization is inevitable. - https://subconscious.substack.com/p/centralization-is-inevitable https://subconscious.substack.com/p/centralization-is-inevit...
- three_seagrass 4y agoYep, power vacuums always have a way of being filled. The question is, do you want it to be controlled by rational actors seeking to exploit everyone else, or an organization that has potential for other (maybe even altruistic) motives?