3 ms·
We may presume the Modern C++ version would have been done even faster, then, and without memory faults.
by pencilguin 4y ago
We may presume the Modern C++ version would have been done even faster, then, and without memory faults.
- bluGill 4y agoThe team in question had decades of c experience, and was doing all new stuff (maybe half of all work?) In autosar. I was working with them on an unrelated C++ project and I can assure you the C++ they write was not very good since the only C++ stuff was things they didn't want to do.
- pencilguin 4y agoWe may presume that, coming in C++, competent modern C++ developers could be found, unlike for immature languages. Building everything performance-critical with immature languages is not a viable alternative. But building with modern C++ is one.
- RealityVoid 4y agoI work with AUTOSAR. I am fairly confident that AUTOSAR itself is the problem and not representative of the productivity you would gain from memory safe stuff. I can also say that the AUTOSAR stacks themselves offer no memory guarantee and have seen way too many bugs in those stacks to have any sort of faith in them.