> Simply because it's limiting. Which is good if you are inexperienced, but not so great once you grow and try to become more productive. A more expressive lang

> Simply because it's limiting. Which is good if you are inexperienced, but not so great once you grow and try to become more productive. A more expressive language is a must then or you'll be stuck. I've never been "stuck" with Go in the sense that I wasn't able to do something I wanted. I've programmed in plenty of more expressive languages over the years, and I don't think there's much difference in terms of productivity. Sure, some more expressive languages allow you to do something very quickly and concisely, but it also increases cognitive load when writing and reading and in the end it seems to balances out. Sometimes I do find myself thinking "gosh, I wish I had $feature_x from $language_y" at times, but I have that with every language. It's a "dumb" languages in that sense, I guess. Which is also why it's nice: you don't have to focus on the mechanics of what you're implementing, you just implement what you want, as per the "Zen of Python"; "There should be one – and preferably only one – obvious way to do it."