2 ms·
We have to. The alternative is destroying the earth even more. And overall, the lifetime environmental impact of solar panels is much lower than producing the
by geysersam 4y ago
We have to. The alternative is destroying the earth even more.
And overall, the lifetime environmental impact of solar panels is much lower than producing the same energy using fossile fuels.
- tsimionescu 4y agoThere is also the option of winding down energy consumption - we produce so much useless crap for no particular reason anyway.
- harimau777 4y agoI think that would need to go hand in hand with social change to allow people greater quality of life outside of consumerism (e.g. greater economic stability, autonomy, home ownership, access to education, etc.). Right now it seems that the social contract is "give up your autonomy and stability to capitalism and in return you get to consume lots of stuff". If we remove the "consume lots of stuff" part of the equation, then I doubt people would be happy with the "give up your autonomy and stability" part.
- hedora 4y agoEnergy efficiency is skyrocketing though. My house uses 25% the energy it would with if we installed 20 year old appliances (even ignoring improvements to insulation).
- geysersam 4y agoYes you're absolutely right