I'd be curious to see what would happen if reasonable regulations stayed in place but we capped/removed the risk associated with litigation (assuming regulation

I'd be curious to see what would happen if reasonable regulations stayed in place but we capped/removed the risk associated with litigation (assuming regulations were followed). I.e. what portion of "adhering to regulation" is reducing the speed of advancement because of fear of litigation, as opposed to just the cost of sticking to the regulation.