3 ms·
Other than the standard people mentioned, there are also the "1992 consensus" [1] which intentionally made the word "China" ambiguous. One possible interpretat
by celestialpeasan 4y ago
Other than the standard people mentioned, there are also the "1992 consensus" [1] which intentionally made the word "China" ambiguous.
One possible interpretation is there's a thing called "de jure China", and both P.R.China and R.O.China (Taiwan) can claim themselves as legit. It's just
de facto R.O.China happens to control only one province within China with is Taiwan (maybe plus some islands from Fujian).
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Consensus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Consensus
Related topics:
One China Policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_China https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_China
Taiwan Independence Movement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_independence_movement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_independence_movement