3 ms·
That wasn't all that similar: https://money.cnn.com/1997/03/14/technology/apple/ https://money.cnn.com/1997/03/14/technology/apple/ It was a smaller fraction
by itsdrewmiller 4y ago
That wasn't all that similar:
https://money.cnn.com/1997/03/14/technology/apple/ https://money.cnn.com/1997/03/14/technology/apple/
It was a smaller fraction of workers (30%) and was the third layoff in the past year, with the previous two happening before Jobs had even rejoined the company (and he wouldn't become CEO for 6 more months, though likely he was shadow CEO only 4 months later).