4 ms·
The entire HTML standard process has traditionally been dominated by people with Very Strong Opinions and little sense of practicality. It's a little better now
by Beltalowda 4y ago
The entire HTML standard process has traditionally been dominated by people with Very Strong Opinions and little sense of practicality. It's a little better now though.
The practical thing to do was to just re-define <i> and <b> to mean what <em> and <strong> were defined as then add additional elements for when more fine-grained meaning if needed. Instead, countless of hours had to be lost on s/<b>/<strong>/g instead.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- xigoi 4y agoThing is, not all uses of <b> are valid uses of <strong>.
- Beltalowda 4y agoBut everyone just did s/<b>/<strong>/, so... This is exactly the sort of "argument from purity" that lacks any practicality that I meant.