3 ms·
fyi, arguments become immediately less convincing when they include "m$" (or make a lot of politically one sided claims without citation)
by joe_guy 4y ago
fyi, arguments become immediately less convincing when they include "m$"
(or make a lot of politically one sided claims without citation)
- thaumasiotes 4y ago> fyi, arguments become immediately less convincing when they include "m$" OK... but deviantbit's comment clearly presents Microsoft as the victim of corrupt government officials, which isn't really compatible with calling it M$. It seems more likely that the use of M$ in "Democrats were going to do anything they could to destroy M$" is to present M$ as a label given to Microsoft by the Democrats in order to make it easier to attack. He's trying to tell you that arguments based on the epithet "M$" are or should be unconvincing.
- deviantbit 4y agoM$ was what Democrats would call Microsoft to demonize them. Just as Biden is demonizing the oil industry. Biden mocked the entire oil industry for making $100 billion dollars. Yet, Apple made $155 billion in 2021. No democrat has asked Apple to turn those profits over, or wanted a wind fall tax. Why? Apple donates heavily to Democrats, and this is why you will never see an anti-trust suite. You can be upset with this, but that is reality.