The logical conclusion from that would be that destroying a persons notebook would be equivalent to violence causing brain damage, and so assault on a person. I

The logical conclusion from that would be that destroying a persons notebook would be equivalent to violence causing brain damage, and so assault on a person. I’m aware of the theory of extended mind this notion is based on, and that’s not going to fly in any real world legal system any time soon. Even Clark and Chalmers that came up with the concept of extended mind don’t think that actually makes practical sense.