4 ms·
> You implied lots of people supported it with this very statement: "was certainly on the mind of all the people who voted against the Republican party this ele
by nozzlegear 4y ago
> You implied lots of people supported it with this very statement: "was certainly on the mind of all the people who voted against the Republican party this election".
Ah. It was already clear that you weren’t arguing in good faith, but this attempt at twisting my words seals it. At the end of the day, it’s clear from the results of the election that American women and citizens in general have rejected these abortion bans, “limits” and restrictions on their personal freedoms. That is made especially clear in the states that had specific referendums on anti-abortion amendments like Kentucky where they failed overwhelmingly.
Americans do not want Republicans placing restrictions on abortion, no matter what legally irrelevant European countries do or have done. I will not be replying further, have a good day.
- PathOfEclipse 4y agoYou: you aren't arguing in good faith, and you are twisting my words! You in the next sentence: what you said is 100% correct. I did imply that people don't support limits on late-term abortion, and, in fact, the outcome of the midterms proves my implication! I seriously wonder what was going through your head when you typed that up. If that's the quality of response you have to offer, then, yes, you should stop replying!