3 ms·
> we can agree that the old logo is just not compatible with something that is modern or inclusive, and it had to go. No we can't agree on that. What you say
by tablespoon 4y ago
> we can agree that the old logo is just not compatible with something that is modern or inclusive, and it had to go.
No we can't agree on that. What you say is nonsense.
- bmacho 4y agoYes, it is nonsense indeed. What about: if they want to signal modernness and inclusiveness (regardless whether they actually want to be modern and inclusive) they had to get rid of the logo?